Psychological Argumentation in Confucian Ethics as a Methodological Issue in Cross-Cultural Philosophy

7Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Graham Priest claims that Asian philosophy is going to constitute one of the most important aspects in 21st-century philosophical research (Priest 2003). Assuming that this statement is true, it leads to a methodological question whether the dominant comparative and contrastive approaches will be supplanted by a more unifying methodology that works across different philosophical traditions. In this article, I concentrate on the use of empirical evidence from nonphilosophical disciplines, which enjoys popularity among many Western philosophers, and examine the application of this approach to early Chinese philosophy. I specifically focus on Confucian ethics and the study of altruism in experimental psychology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banka, R. (2016). Psychological Argumentation in Confucian Ethics as a Methodological Issue in Cross-Cultural Philosophy. Dao, 15(4), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-016-9523-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free