“DANK” customs, bootlegs, and reworked pieces

  • Bain A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Three secondary works born from streetwear fashion have been identified, and it is the objective of this paper to elucidate why trademark use in customs, bootlegs, and reworked pieces is deserving of legal protection. The paper travels through the oppression embedded in the fashion industry, highlighting its hostility towards street associations, which provides justifications for the reappropriation of a trademark. To do so, it explores the origins of streetwear and locates it within the industry. It recognises that these secondary works sit uneasily within trademark law and free expression principles as courts fluctuate with determining the legality of their trademark use. Additionally, the interrelationship between secondary works and their online distribution reveals an existential burden on platforms to police the use of trade marks without the sufficient tools to do so. This work adopts a sociolegal approach as the topic explores the letter of the law and its implications on society and its subcultures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bain, A. (2020). “DANK” customs, bootlegs, and reworked pieces. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(3–4), 375–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free