Early Surgery and Screw-Only Osteosyntheses in Minimally Invasive Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures—Risk or Benefit for Our Patients?

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This study aims to analyze the outcomes following the minimally invasive surgery of calcaneal fractures using screw-only osteosynthesis, as well as the impact of surgical timing. Methods: Between 2015 and 2020, 155 patients with 168 fractures were included. According to the Sanders classification, 48.21% of fractures were classified as Sanders 2, 33.33% as Sanders 3, and 10.11% as Sanders 4 fractures, with the remaining fractures unclassified. A total of 117 cases were treated on the day of admission or the following day. The surgeries followed a standardized protocol for fracture analysis, positioning, and X-ray techniques, primarily using a percutaneous approach with stab incisions. Osteosynthesis was mainly performed using screws, with five cases treated with K-wires for open fractures. Results: The mean Boehler’s angle improved from 8.52° preoperatively to 25.00° postoperatively. Three superficial infections were observed. Deep infections occurred in three cases, all following open fractures. Secondary dislocation was noted in five patients—one due to a deep infection, and four attributed to clear technical failures. One case involved a questionable indication for a screw change (7.3 mm screw) after two weeks due to perforation of the medial wall. A total of 79 fractures were followed up for an average of 4 years and 3 months. The mean AOFAS score was 91.3, and the mean FAOS score was 88.7. Surgery within 7 days after admission showed no significant impact on the outcomes. Conclusions: Minimally invasive screw-only osteosynthesis with early surgical intervention offers favorable outcomes with minimal risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodemund, C., Katzensteiner, M., Vogel, M., & Mattiassich, G. (2025). Early Surgery and Screw-Only Osteosyntheses in Minimally Invasive Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures—Risk or Benefit for Our Patients? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14020344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free