The Rule Of Schulze And Hardy

119Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a brief historical survey various attempts to explain the rule of Schulze and Hardy are mentioned. It is argued that the inverse proportionality between the coagulation concentration and the sixth power of the charge number of the counterion, as it has been derived from the DLVO theory, cannot be the complete explanation, since as a rule potentials in the Gouy layer are not high enough. It is shown that a combination of van der Waals attraction and electrostatic repulsion can explain the rule of Schulze and Hardy, if adsorption of counterions in the Stern layer is taken into account. The adsorption potential must then increase fairly strongly with the charge of the counterion. Structural forces (due to the molecular structure of the solvent) may be important, but the quantitative theory of these forces has not yet been sufficiently developed to incorporate them in the theory of coagulation. © 1980, Walter de Gruyter. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Theodoor, J., & Overbeek, G. (1980). The Rule Of Schulze And Hardy. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 52(5), 1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198052051151

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free