How to mitigate cyanobacterial blooms and cyanotoxin production in eutrophic water reservoirs?

20Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cyanobacterial blooms and cyanotoxin production were studied for 2 years in four hydrologically modified lakes with nutrient-rich waters. We hypothesized that frequency of flushing may considerably influence cyanobacterial blooms. Abundance, biomass and diversity of cyanobacteria as well as cyanotoxins’ variability and concentrations (by HPLC–PDA; -FLD) were determined. In two larger lakes, into which nutrient-rich water was supplied once a year, lower cyanobacterial species diversity, higher biomass of Microcystis spp., Aphanizomenon spp., Dolichospermum spp. and higher microcystin (MC) concentrations were found. In the other lakes, with several irregular water-level manipulations per year (alternating outputs and inputs), higher diversity, lower biomass of cyanobacteria and MC concentrations were observed. MC-LF, -LR and -RR produced by Microcystis spp. predominated in the more stable lakes, whereas in the lakes with frequent water manipulations different species of Oscillatoriales developed and MC-LA, -LY, -LW and -WR were also important. RDA analysis revealed that the frequency of water manipulations was the most significant variable for composition of cyanobacterial communities. The study highlights that a higher frequency of water-level manipulations, which increased flushing rate, was beneficial to nutrient-rich water reservoirs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pawlik-Skowronska, B., & Toporowska, M. (2016). How to mitigate cyanobacterial blooms and cyanotoxin production in eutrophic water reservoirs? Hydrobiologia, 778(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2842-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free