From Pillarized Active Membership to Populist Active Citizenship: The Dutch Do Democracy

26Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This contribution about the Netherlands to the special issue [or: section] on volunteering and civic action focuses on changes in public understanding and policy perspectives. Developments since the second half of the nineteenth century show shifting emphases on active membership (based on associational life and typical of the phenomenon of ‘pillarization’), active citizenship (based more on an individual sense of responsibility and more or less political in nature) and unpaid work (volunteering as a gift to society and other people). Government policy over the last two decades has focused heavily on ‘reponsibilization’ of citizens, both as regards providing help to others when they need it (unpaid work/informal care) and in terms of their relationship with the society in which they live (active citizenship). We expand further on the recent notion of the ‘do-democracy’ as a populist and anti-political way of doing things together on a small scale instead of engaging in democratic controversies and trying to get a grip on big issues.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dekker, P. (2019). From Pillarized Active Membership to Populist Active Citizenship: The Dutch Do Democracy. Voluntas, 30(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00058-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free