p21/WAF1 expression in human colorectal carcinoma: Association with p53, transcription factor AP-2 and prognosis

63Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

p21/WAF1 expression was studied in a series of 162 colorectal carcinoma patients and its relation to p53- and activator protein (AP)-2 expressions and to stage as well as survival was assessed. p21 expression was moderate or intense in 33% of the tumours, and 53% of the tumours had moderate or strong p53 staining intensity. Eighty nine percent of the tumours showed a weak cytoplasmic AP-2 signal. As expected, p21 and p53 stainings were inversely related to each other (P < 0.001). There was a significant positive association between p21 and AP-2 expression levels (P = 0.01). p21 intensity and percentage were higher in Dukes' A and B stages (P < 0.001). The cancer-related survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly lower among patients with a low signal for p21 (P < 0.001) and low p21 percentage in tumour epithelium (P < 0.001). High p53 staining intensity in tumour epithelium predicted poor survival (P = 0.01) and RFS (P = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, p21 percentage distribution independently predicted cancer-related survival in all cases, and p21 expression intensity in T1-4/NO-3/MO and T1-3/NO/MO cases. p21 percentage distribution was an independent predictor of RFS in all and T1-3/NO/MO cases. AP-2 staining did not reach any prognostic significance. These results suggest that the immunohistochemical detection of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 could be used to predict more precisely the outcome of colorectal cancer patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ropponen, K. M., Kellokoski, J. K., Lipponen, P. K., Pietiläinen, T., Eskelinen, M. J., Alhava, E. M., & Kosma, V. M. (1999). p21/WAF1 expression in human colorectal carcinoma: Association with p53, transcription factor AP-2 and prognosis. British Journal of Cancer, 81(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690662

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free