(De)coupling Positional Whiteness and White Identities through “Good English” in Singapore

15Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

English in Singapore occupies an ambivalent status as both global bridge and threat to local “cultural values” (Tan 2017). English is also constructed as threatened by Singlish, or Singaporean Colloquial English (Wee 2018). This article first elaborates the historical-institutional production of a covert raciolinguistic community—“Caucasian” English speakers—whose speech ideologically contrasts with Singaporeans’ “non-native” English. It then analyzes a crowdsourced self-help column, “English as It Is Broken,” and participant observation at a Singlish awareness class. I argue that the figure of the native-English-speaking foreigner (by default white and, increasingly, American) continues to anchor what counts as “Good English” and rescales intersectional self-and other evaluations of Singaporeans’ linguistic deficiency. Good English thus invites aspirational investments in whiteness-as-position (a superordinate position in global, racializing hierarchies) but remains a target that Sin-gaporeans are cast as forever failing to meet due to their nonwhite identities (not “being” white).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Babcock, J. (2023). (De)coupling Positional Whiteness and White Identities through “Good English” in Singapore. Signs and Society, 11(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/722624

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free