THE INFLUENCE OF FRAUD TRIANGLE FACTORS ON REAL EARNINGS MANAGEMENT

3Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between factors of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization, and the occurrence of real earnings management among Malaysian public listed companies. The study used a sample of 557 Malaysian public listed companies between 2017 and 2019, comprising a total of 1,671 firm-year observations. Replicating a study by Khanh and Nguyen (2018), but not limited to external governance of audit quality, the study added to the knowledge of real earnings management by taking into account the effect of internal governance such as board independence and multiple directorships. And, following Roychowdhury (2006), real earnings management is measured by abnormal cash flow from operations, abnormal production costs, and abnormal discretionary expenditure. The results from regression analysis show that there is a negative and significant association between financial performance, measured by return on assets, and real earnings management. In addition, the results also show that there is a positive and significant association between audit quality, measured by audit firm size, and real earnings management. The findings of this study provide useful insights for the investors to reassess firm corporate governance, and for the regulators to reconsider the current regulations with regard to the practice of real earnings management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasnan, S., Othman, N., Hussain, A. R. M., & Ali, M. M. (2022). THE INFLUENCE OF FRAUD TRIANGLE FACTORS ON REAL EARNINGS MANAGEMENT. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 11(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i2art8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free