Residuality and Inconsistency in the Interpretation of Socio-Theoretical Systems

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article addresses the interpretation and criticism of theoretical systems. Its particular focus is on how to assess the success of theories in dealing with some specific phenomenon. We are interested in how to differentiate between cases where a theory offers an unsatisfactory acknowledgment of a specified phenomenon and those where a theory offers a deeper, more systematic understanding. We address these metatheoretical issues by developing Parsons’s analysis of positive and residual categories in various respects, including a focus on mutual support as the basis of positivity, differentiating synectic (reconcilable) and antinomic (irreconcilable) residual categories, and distinguishing divisions that are central to systems from those between center and periphery. We also consider how this conceptual toolkit can be put into practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouzanis, C., & Kemp, S. (2019). Residuality and Inconsistency in the Interpretation of Socio-Theoretical Systems. Sociological Theory, 37(3), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275119869973

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free