The ubiquity of divinity according to Iamblichus and Syrianus

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In two passages in particular of his Commentary on the Timaeus, Proclus attributes to his master Syrianus a series of arguments in favour of not confining gods or daemons to any particular level of the universe, either hypercosmic or encosmic, as had been the more or less universal practice of earlier Platonists, but asserting the ubiquity of all classes of 'higher being' at every level, and criticising earlier doctrine as in effect cutting the gods off from contact with man, thus undermining the power of theurgy. This interesting development was in fact initiated (as in so many other details of Syrianus' doctrine) by his Syrian forerunner Iamblichus of Chalkis, and it is this doctrine that this essay seeks to explore. © Copyright 2013 John Dillon.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dillon, J. (2013). The ubiquity of divinity according to Iamblichus and Syrianus. In International Journal of Platonic Tradition (Vol. 7, pp. 145–155). https://doi.org/10.1163/18725473-12341260

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free