Flow-dependent uptake of 123I-CMICE-013, a novel SPECT perfusion agent, compared with standard tracers

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rotenone derivatives have shown promise in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). CMICE-013 is a novel 123I-labeled rotenone derivative developed for SPECT MPI. The objective of this study was to assess the image quality of CMICE-013 and compare its uptake with tetrofosmin, sestamibi, and 201Tl in vivo in a porcine model of stress-induced myocardial ischemia. Methods: Microspheres were injected simultaneously with the radiotracer injections at rest and stress to measure blood flow. Mimicking a 1-d tetrofosmin protocol, stress imaging used 3 times as much activity and occurred 1 h after the rest injection. SPECT images were obtained at both rest and stress. After imaging, the heart was sectioned into 44-50 pieces. In each heart sample, the tracer uptake was measured in a y counter. The images were aligned, and the decay-corrected ratio of the signals at rest and stress was used to separate the well-counter signal into rest and stress components. The uptake at rest and stress was compared with microsphere flow measurements. Results: The CMICE-013 images showed good contrast between the heart and surrounding organs, with heart-to-liver and heart-to-lung uptake ratios similar to those of the standard tracers. Uptake of CMICE-013 was 1.5% of the injected dose at rest and increased more rapidly with increased blood flow than did the standard SPECT tracers. The percentage injected dose of CMICE-013 taken up by the heart was greater (P < 0.05) than 201Tl, tetrofosmin, or sestamibi at flows greater than 1.5 mL/min/g. Conclusion: CMICE-013 is a promising new SPECT MPI agent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wells, R. G., Wei, L., Petryk, J., Duan, Y., Marvin, B., Timmins, R., … Ruddy, T. D. (2015). Flow-dependent uptake of 123I-CMICE-013, a novel SPECT perfusion agent, compared with standard tracers. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 56(5), 764–770. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.151563

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free