Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique

50Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The definition of orthographic neighbour (Coltheart et al., 1977) was analysed in two experiments using a variety of the three-field technique (Humphreys et al., 1988). With this technique, a clearly visible prime (in lower-case letters) is followed by a briefly presented upper-case word which is immediately masked. Pairs of five-letter neighbouring words were selected. Only orthographically related pairs that differed from the prime by the third letter (women-WOVEN) or the fourth letter (frost-FRONT) showed (inhibitory) relatedness effects compared with an unrelated word condition. The results suggest that models of visual word recognition should be modified to address the fact that some letter positions are more important than others.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perea, M. (1998). Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909698386609

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free