Interfractional renal and diaphragmatic position variation during radiotherapy in children and adults: is there a difference?

11Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Pediatric safety margins are generally based on data from adult studies; however, adult-based margins might be too large for children. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare interfractional organ position variation in children and adults. Material and methods: For 35 children and 35 adults treated with thoracic/abdominal irradiation, 850 (range 5–30 per patient) retrospectively collected cone beam CT images were registered to the reference CT that was used for radiation treatment planning purposes. Renal position variation was assessed in three orthogonal directions and summarized as 3D vector lengths. Diaphragmatic position variation was assessed in the cranio-caudal (CC) direction only. We calculated means and SDs to estimate group systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) of organ position variation. Finally, we investigated possible correlations between organ position variation and patients’ height. Results: Interfractional organ position variation was different in children and adults. Median 3D right and left kidney vector lengths were significantly smaller in children than in adults (2.8, 2.9 mm vs. 5.6, 5.2 mm, respectively; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Dijk, I. W. E. M., Huijskens, S. C., de Jong, R., Visser, J., Fajardo, R. D., Rasch, C. R. N., … Bel, A. (2017). Interfractional renal and diaphragmatic position variation during radiotherapy in children and adults: is there a difference? Acta Oncologica, 56(8), 1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2017.1299936

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free