This artice is free to access.
To shed light on the effects of individual choice on pension wealth, we study a policy change to the management fees of pension funds implemented by Peru’s government in 2013. The reform established a new balance fee as a default option; this fee is calculated as a percentage of the pension balance. Each individual had the initial option of keeping the previous management fee, a load factor fee calculated as a percentage of the individ- ual’s salary. We use administrative data to simulate pension balances based on the indi- vidual’s choice of fee and the corresponding counterfactual. Our results indicate that the reform has been potentially adverse to 63.1% of individuals, of whom 41.4% were assigned to the default option and 21.7% voluntarily chose the load fee. These results reflect both the potentially negative unintended effects of the policy and an alarming lack of financial literacy among citizens. We also detect heterogeneity in the intensity of the losses and gains due to the reform, which caused greater losses than gains. In particular, younger and poorer individuals, as well as those automatically assigned to the balance fee, experienced higher losses. Moreover, the new fee scheme is also associated with increasing inequality between individuals’ pension wealth.
Bernal, N., & Olivera, J. (2020). Choice of pension management fees and effects on pension wealth. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 176, 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.036