Restricting free speech: The impact on opposition parties in Singapore

24Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although there has been a great deal of publicity surrounding the restriction of free speech with regard to opposition parties in Singapore, in real terms, the value of free speech for such parties is limited. First, defamation laws in Singapore require the opposition parties to exercise extreme caution to ensure political comments do not result in costly defamation suits or even imprisonment. Second, free speech in itself is of limited use politically for opposition parties if the content of this speech is not disseminated widely by the local media. As a result, both the fear of legal suits and the limited dissemination of content continue to restrict the potential of free speech for opposition parties in Singapore. This means the contribution of free speech activities to inter-party debate is low in Singapore, thereby undermining the fundamental role of democracy premised on fair inter-party competition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gomez, J. (2006). Restricting free speech: The impact on opposition parties in Singapore. In Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies (pp. 105–131). Copenhagen Business School. https://doi.org/10.22439/cjas.v23i1.694

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free