Conclusion

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The use of DFT in music theory really soared after the notion was resuscitated from Lewin’s work by Quinn [72] in 2005. As we have seen, it bears the tremendous advantage that each coefficient, and moreover each polar coordinate of each coefficient, yields dramatically important musical information (say, the phase of a5 shows which diatonic universe is closest to the pc-set in question). Some musical qualities are immediately visible in Fourier space whereas they require computations in the original musical domain (say, pc-distributions); Fourier space, with this minimised computational complexity, is closest to our perception of music. Indeed, psycho-acoustic experiments on the perception of saliency (and its evil twin, low saliency including nullity of a coefficient) should be enhanced and furthered, since Furier qualities seem to mirror exactly musical features processed by the human brain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amiot, E. (2016). Conclusion. In Computational Music Science (pp. 179–181). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45581-5_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free