Geographic structure of genetic and phenotypic variation in the hybrid zone between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina in Mexico

22Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Analyzing the structure of hybrid zones is important for inferring their origin, dynamics and evolutionary significance. We examined the geographic structure of phenotypic and genetic variation in the contact zone between two Mexican red oaks, Quercus affinis and Q. laurina. A total of 105 individuals from seven populations were sampled along a 600-km latitudinal gradient representing the distribution area of the two species and their contact zone. Individuals were genotyped for nine nuclear and four chloroplast DNA microsatellite loci (ncSSR and cpSSR, respectively), and characterized for several leaf and acorn traits. The cpSSR data revealed extensive haplotype sharing among populations of the two species, while a Bayesian assignment analysis based on ncSSRs identified two main genetic groups, each corresponding to one of the species, and two populations in the contact zone showing evidence of admixture. The proportion of genetic ancestry in the populations was strongly associated with latitude and showed a pattern of variation with the shape of a narrow sigmoidal cline. The variation in three of the seven phenotypic traits was partially congruent with molecular variation, while the other traits did not conform to a geographic cline but instead were correlated with environmental variables. In conclusion, the hybrid zone between the two oak species has some of the characteristics of a tension zone, but heterogeneous variation across traits suggests differential introgression and the action of extrinsic selection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramos-Ortiz, S., Oyama, K., Rodríguez-Correa, H., & González-Rodríguez, A. (2016). Geographic structure of genetic and phenotypic variation in the hybrid zone between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina in Mexico. Plant Species Biology, 31(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free