Magnetic Continuum Robot with Modular Axial Magnetization: Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Control

16Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Magnetic continuum robots (MCRs) have become popular owing to their inherent advantages of easy miniaturization without requiring complicated transmission structures. The evolution of MCRs, from initial designs with one embedded magnet to current designs with specific magnetization profile configurations (MPCs), has significantly enhanced their dexterity. While much progress has been achieved, the quantitative index-based evaluation of deformability for different MPCs, which can assist in designing MPCs with enhanced robot deformability, has not been addressed before. Here, we use "deformability"to describe the capability for body deflection when an MCR forms different global shapes under an external magnetic field. Therefore, in this article, we propose methodologies to design and control an MCR composed of modular axially magnetized segments. To guide robot MPC design, for the first time, we introduce a quantitative index-based evaluation strategy to analyze and optimize robot deformability. In addition, a control framework with neural network-based controllers is developed to endow the robot with two control modes: the robot tip position and orientation ($M_{1}$) and the global shape ($M_{2}$). The excellent performance of the learnt controllers in terms of computation time and accuracy was validated via both simulation and experimental platforms. In the experimental results, the best closed-loop control performance metrics, indicated as the mean absolute errors, were 0.254 mm and 0.626$ $ for mode $M_{1}$ and 1.564 mm and 0.086$ $ for mode $M_{2}$.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cao, Y., Cai, M., Sun, B., Qi, Z., Xue, J., Jiang, Y., … Zhang, L. (2025). Magnetic Continuum Robot with Modular Axial Magnetization: Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 41, 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2025.3526077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free