Critiquing text analysis in social modeling: Best practices, limitations, and new frontiers

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) is an important contributor to the field of social modeling. Language is a social artifact; it is how people express opinions, persuade, or convey what they believe is important. It is thus rightly recognized that computational tools can automate at least some of the analytical work of reading an ever-increasing volume of textual data, reducing time and costs. Language is also, however, a complex and variegated system, creating a challenge for social modelers. In this paper, we contend NLP's full potential is commonly not being exploited, leading to unnecessary work and lower-quality results, and that social modelers using NLP should understand at a high level what NLP problems are, and are not, solved. Our findings have implications for both the practice and validation of NLP in the social modeling community. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chew, P. A. (2013). Critiquing text analysis in social modeling: Best practices, limitations, and new frontiers. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7812 LNCS, pp. 350–358). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free