Influence of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on uterine peristalsis in infertile women

63Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION Is there a difference in the characteristics of uterine peristalsis in natural and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER COH significantly changed the uterine peristaltic pattern. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In natural menstrual cycles, the periodic changes of uterine peristalsis are closely related to the reproductive process. STUDY DESIGN , SIZE, DURATION This is a prospective cohort study with a total of 64 subjects involved. The study was performed between May 2011 and August 2011. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Sixty-four infertile women with regular, ovulatory menstrual cycles underwent follicular tracking in one natural cycle and after ovarian stimulation (GnRH-agonist down-regulation) in the subsequent cycle (COH). Three time points were studied in both cycles: at LH surge/HCG plus 1 day, ovulation/oocyte retrieval and 2 days after ovulation/retrieval. The study was performed in an IVF center of the university-affiliated Xiangya hospital. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Uterine peristaltic wave frequency was 1.31 times higher in the COH than in the natural cycle (P< 0.01). At all three time points in the COH cycle, waves moving from the cervix to fundus dominated, comprising 8090 of the wave types observed, while 'no activity' was more frequently observed in the natural cycle. The wave frequency was positively correlated with the level of serum estradiol (E2) (r 0.30; P< 0.01) and negatively correlated with the progesterone level (r -0.48; P< 0.01) for the physiological range of steroid levels. No correlation was found between the wave frequency and supraphysiological concentrations of E2 or progesterone. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The two observers were not independent and this was a limitation of the study. Quantitative measurements of wave amplitude in the different cycles should be compared in future research. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Uterine peristalsis was much higher in the COH cycle than in the natural cycle. The endometrial movements did not weaken to the natural level before embryo transfer, even with high levels of progesterone. The wave frequency was positively correlated with serum E2 level and negatively correlated with that of progesterone within the physiological range. No correlation was found between the wave frequency and supraphysiological concentrations of E2 and progesterone. © The Author 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, L., Li, Y., & Xu, A. (2012). Influence of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on uterine peristalsis in infertile women. Human Reproduction, 27(9), 2684–2689. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des257

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free