Effects of protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase inhibitors on growth and ultrastructure of Trypanosoma cruzi

34Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An increasing number of protein kinases (PKs) of parasitic protozoa are being evaluated as drug targets. Some PK inhibitors display antiproliferative effects on protozoa. We tested three PK inhibitors on the growth and ultrastructure of epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi and the effect of these drugs on intracellular amastigotes. They were staurosporine (serine/threonine kinase inhibitor), genistein (tyrosine kinase inhibitor), and wortmannin (phosphatidylinositol 3′ (PI3) kinase inhibitor). All drugs inhibited epimastigote growth at the concentrations tested. Wortmannin inhibited parasite growth at the lowest concentrations. However, staurosporine was the most effective after 24 h treatment and genistein caused the stronger inhibition during the whole treatment (60-70% inhibition). The IC50 were: staurosporine: 6.43±1.28 μM; genistein: 6.54±1.86 μM; and wortmannin: 0.056±0.014 μM. These PK inhibitors had strong ultrastructural effects on the epimastigotes: abnormal chromatin condensation of the nucleus; loose flagellar membrane with the formation of blebs; incomplete cell division; autophagosomes and myelin-like figures. These drugs did not interfere with the division of intracellular amastigotes or with its differentiation to trypomastigotes. However, as trypanosomes have kinomes that contain a large set of protein kinases and phosphatases, PKs should not be disregarded as an important target for chemotherapy of Chagas disease. © 2006 Federation of European Microbiological Societies Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braga, M. V., & De Souza, W. (2006). Effects of protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase inhibitors on growth and ultrastructure of Trypanosoma cruzi. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 256(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00125.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free