Pitanga

  • Silva S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the differences between male and female college students in 16 personality factors and the related factors. Methods: Meta-analytic method was used to calculate 22 group data in 21 studies which with Cattell 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) as a tool from 2000 to 2009. Results: The scores of 16PF in female college students were higher than that in male college students in 7 personality factors (warmth, intellect, liveliness, sensitivity, abstractness, privateness, apprehension), and the average effect sizes ranged from −0. 41 to −0. 08 (Ps < 0. 01). The scores in male college students were higher than that in female college students in 2 personality factors (emotional stability, perseverance), and the average effect sizes were 0. 19 and 0.08 (Ps < 0. 001). In the multilevel models, warmth, self-reliance and tension were related to age group (β₁ =0. 05, −0. 04, 0. 04; Ps < 0. 05). Emotional stability and social boldness were related to year-of-publication (β1, = 0. 04, 0. 05; Ps < 0. 01). Liveliness was related to scale edition (β1, = 0. 07, P < 0. 05). Openness to change was related to sample size (β1 = 0. 001, P < 0. 05). Openness to change and tension were related to quality-of-publication (β1 = 0. 13, −0. II; Ps < 0. 05). Self-reliance was related to region (β1, = −0. 15, P < 0.001). Conclusion: There are marked differences between male and female college students in 9 personality factors. Influenced by age group, year-of-publication, scale edition, sample size, quality-of-publication, region, the differences between male and female college students' scores in 7 personality factors (warmth, emotional stability, liveliness, social boldness, openness to change, self-reliance, tension) show an increasing tendency. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved). (journal abstract)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva, S. de M. (2006). Pitanga. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-29452006000100001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free