The minimum wage versus the earned income tax credit for reducing poverty

  • Burkhauser R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The minimum wage versus the earned income tax credit for reducing poverty. IZA World of Labor 2015: 153 doi: 10.15185/izawol.153 | Richard V. Burkhauser © | May 2015 | wol.iza.org 1 1 Pros There is little causal evidence that minimum wage increases will reduce poverty rates overall or for workers. Minimum wage increases go primarily to workers in non-poor families. Some workers lose their jobs when minimum wages rise, pushing their families into poverty. Most working-age poor people do not work, work part-time, or have wages above proposed increases in the minimum wage. Earned income tax credits more efficiently provide benefits to workers in poor families and increase employment in them. eLeVaTOR PiTch Minimum wage increases are not an effective mechanism for reducing poverty. And there is little causal evidence that they do so. Most workers who gain from minimum wage increases do not live in poor (or near-poor) families, while some who do live in poor families lose their job as a result of such increases. The earned income tax credit is an effective way to reduce poverty. It raises only the after-tax wage rates of workers in low-and moderate-income families, its tax credit increases with the number of dependent children, and evidence shows that it increases labor force participation and employment in these families. auThOR's MaiN MessaGe Introducing or increasing a minimum wage is a common policy measure aimed at reducing poverty. But the minimum wage is unlikely to achieve this goal. While a minimum wage hike will increase the wage earnings of some poor families and lift them out of poverty, some workers will lose their jobs, pushing their families into poverty. In contrast, improving the earned income tax credit can provide the same income transfers to the working poor at far lower cost. Earned income tax credits effectively raise the hourly wages only of workers in low-and moderate-income families, while increasing labor force participation and employment in those families. cons Minimum wage increases at most only have a small negative effect on employment. Minimum wage increases circumvent the budget process: they are funded neither by government expenditures nor by tax liabilities. The macroeconomic effects of a higher propensity to spend by those whose wages rise because of a minimum wage hike reduce its negative microeconomic effects on employment. Minimum wage increases during the expansion phase of a business cycle, when labor demand is growing, can reduce poverty if the employment effects are small. The minimum wage versus the earned income tax credit for reducing poverty Enhancing the earned income tax credit would do more to reduce poverty, at less cost, than increasing the minimum wage

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burkhauser, R. (2015). The minimum wage versus the earned income tax credit for reducing poverty. IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.153

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free