Development and reliability of test to measure perceptual-motor performance in combat sports: the Striking Reaction Time Task (SRTT)

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The perceptual-motor performance of 15 professional mixed martial arts (MMA) athletes was evaluated using the Striking Reaction Time Task (SRTT). Six LED sensors equipped with motion sensors, controlled by a smartphone application, were attached to specific anatomical targets on a human-like figure using a body opponent bag (BOB). The SRTT consisted of two blocks: SRTT-Simple, where one LED sensor was illuminated at a time, and SRTT-Complex, where all six LED sensors were illuminated, with the target sensor highlighted in a different color. Each block included 120 stimuli. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and minimal detectable change (MDC) of reaction time (RT) were analyzed. Perceptual-motor performance, measured by RT, varied according to the stimulus type, with SRTT-Complex tasks resulting in longer RTs compared to SRTT-Simple tasks for all strikes except hooks. All strikes demonstrated good to excellent reliability, with ICC values ranging from 0.76 to 0.96 (95% CI: 0.62–0.98), CV values between 11% and 17%, and MDC values ranging from 47 to 136 ms, depending on the strike and stimulus type. These findings suggest that the SRTT is a reliable tool for assessing sport-specific perceptual-motor performance in striking combat sports. Future studies should investigate its sensitivity in distinguishing between non-athletes and athletes of varying skill levels, as well as its responsiveness to training interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faro, H., Lima, L. A. D. de, Silva, R. D. M. da, Mortatti, A. L., & Machado, D. G. da S. (2025). Development and reliability of test to measure perceptual-motor performance in combat sports: the Striking Reaction Time Task (SRTT). Revista de Artes Marciales Asiaticas, 20(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.18002/rama.v20i1.2505

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free