Synthetic vs. natural/biodegradable polymers for delivery of shRNA-based Cancer Therapies

24Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Summary: DNA vector-based short hairpin RNA (shRNA) as a means of effecting RNA interference (RNAi) is a promising mechanism for the precise disruption of gene expression to achieve a therapeutic effect. The clinical usage of shRNA therapeutics in cancer is limited by obstacles related to effective delivery into the nuclei of target cancer cells. Significant pre-clinical data have been amassed about biodegradable and non-biodegradable polymeric delivery vehicles that are relevant for shRNA delivery into humans. Here, we will review some leading candidates for clinical usage with a focus on studies relating to their potential for usage in cancer shRNA therapeutics and discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of using biodegradable and non-biodegradable delivery vehicles. © 2009 Humana Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vorhies, J. S., & Nemunaitis, J. J. (2009). Synthetic vs. natural/biodegradable polymers for delivery of shRNA-based Cancer Therapies. Methods in Molecular Biology, 480, 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-429-2_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free