The rise of rightwing populism in the last decade, but more recently also the seemingly “authoritarian” measures taken by the state in protection against the COVID-19 pandemic, inspire ever more frequent comparisons with historical fascism. The paper discusses to what extent such a diachronic comparison is empirically and methodologically sound. The analysis is based in Max Weber’s concept of “ideal type”, which can be used as a tertium comparationis. The concept of “fascist minimum”, which systematizes the structural features of fascist movements and regimes, provides a standard of comparison that combines theoretical rigor and empirical substance. Applying the concept of “fascist minimum”, the article examines if and to what extent current tendencies of and in German politics deserve to be called “fascist”.
CITATION STYLE
Bach, M. (2021). National populism and fascism in a comparative historical perspective. Max Weber’s sociology of domination revisited. Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie, 31(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-021-00436-8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.