News from Generative Artificial Intelligence Is Believed Less

40Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) can generate text virtually indistinguishable from text written by humans. A key question, then, is whether people believe news headlines generated by AI as much as news headlines generated by humans. AI is viewed as lacking human motives and emotions, suggesting that people might view news written by AI as more accurate. By contrast, two pre-registered experiments on representative U.S. samples (N = 4, 034) showed that people rated news headlines written by AI as less accurate than those written by humans. People were more likely to incorrectly rate news headlines written by AI (vs. a human) as inaccurate when they were actually true, and more likely to correctly rate them as inaccurate when they were indeed false. Our findings are important given the increasing adoption of AI in news generation, and the associated ethical and governance pressures to disclose it use and address standards of transparency and accountability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Longoni, C., Fradkin, A., Cian, L., & Pennycook, G. (2022). News from Generative Artificial Intelligence Is Believed Less. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 97–106). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free