Comparison of Pegged and Keeled Glenoid Components for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

  • Khazzam M
  • Argo M
  • Landrum M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BackgroundLimited evidence exists regarding the relative rates of glenoid loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing pegged or keeled cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components.MethodsA systematic review of level I, II, and III studies comparing the development of radiolucent lines and glenoid failure after total shoulder arthroplasty with pegged or keeled glenoid components was conducted. Four articles were included in the final analysis with a total of 203 total shoulder arthroplasties comprising 107 pegged and 96 keeled glenoid components.ResultsDevelopment of radiolucent lines was less likely with pegged glenoid components with a risk difference of −0.32 (95% CI −0.62, −0.03) favoring the pegged design. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of radiographically at-risk glenoids, clinical glenoid failure, or the composite endpoint.ConclusionsAlthough the development of radiolucent lines was less likely around pegged glenoid components, there was no significant differ...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khazzam, M., Argo, M., Landrum, M., & Box, H. (2017). Comparison of Pegged and Keeled Glenoid Components for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty, 1, 247154921770532. https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549217705323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free