Future teachers debate charter schools on Facebook: analysing their political subjectivities

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

We argue that Garrett and Segall’s concepts of ‘doing school’ and ‘pushing back’ are valuable tools for analysing pre-service teachers’ political views of neoliberal education reforms such as the introduction of charter schools. We extend Garrett and Segall’s conceptualization by hybridizing ‘doing school’ and ‘pushing back’ in order to move beyond a simplistic celebration of student resistance, which often overlooks forms of resistance that are compliant with the status quo, in this case the neoliberal status quo. We analyse participants’ political views as they emerged in a debate about charter schools in New Zealand. Garrett and Segall’s concepts, in conjunction with poststructuralist theories of subjectivity, are deployed as analytical tools for understanding the complexity of students’ political subjectivities in a debate conducted on a Facebook page set up for that purpose.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nairn, K., Anderson, V., & Blanch, K. (2018). Future teachers debate charter schools on Facebook: analysing their political subjectivities. Discourse, 39(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1228045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free