Abstract
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is critical to HCV elimination efforts. Simplified diagnostics are required for low-resource settings and difficult-To-reach populations. This retrospective study assessed performance of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for detection of HCV antibodies. Methods: Two lots of 13 RDTs were evaluated at 3 laboratories using archived plasma samples from 4 countries (Nigeria, Georgia, Cambodia, and Belgium). HCV status was determined using 3 reference tests according to a composite algorithm. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected populations. Operational characteristics were also assessed. Results: In total, 1710 samples met inclusion criteria. In HIV-uninfected samples (nâ =â 384), the majority of RDTs had sensitivity ≥98% in 1 or both lots and most RDTs had specificity ≥99%. In HIV-infected samples (nâ =â 264), specificity remained high but sensitivity was markedly lower than in HIV-uninfected samples; only 1 RDT reached >95%. The majority of HIV-infected samples for which sensitivity was low did not have detectable HCV viral load/core antigen. Interreader variability, lot-To-lot variability, and rate of invalid runs were low for all RDTs (<2%). Conclusions: HCV RDTs should be evaluated in the intended target population, as sensitivity can be impacted by population factors such as HIV status. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04033887.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Vetter, B. N., Reipold, E. I., Ongarello, S., Audu, R., Ige, F. A., Alkhazashvili, M., … Fransen, K. (2022). Sensitivity and Specificity of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Hepatitis C Virus with or Without HIV Coinfection: A Multicentre Laboratory Evaluation Study. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 226(3), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa389
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.