Survival and transplantation in end-stage renal disease: A prospective study of a multiethnic population

16Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction. Accurate assessment of determinants of patient survival in end-stage renal disease is important for counselling, clinical management and resource planning. To address this we have analysed survival and risk factors for survival for patients treated for end-stage renal disease in a multi-ethnic UK population.Methods. A multicentre prospective observational cohort study was performed in four teaching hospital renal units serving a total population of four million people. A total of 884 consecutive patients treated with renal replacement therapy were studied. Cox proportional hazard modelling and adjusted survival curves were used to assess the impact of a range of variables on patients surviving dialysis for more than 90 days. Further analysis was undertaken to determine the likelihood of transplantation in different ethnic groups.Results. Survival was 29 after a mean and median follow up of 4.6 and 4.2 years, respectively. Factors associated with worse survival included the following: age; for each decade of life the relative risk (RR) of death was 1.52 (95 confidence intervals 1.41-1.65, p < 0.0001); comorbidity, one or two comorbid conditions, RR = 1.56 (95 CI 1.24-1.95, p < 0.001) and three or more comorbid conditions, RR = 2.34 (1.68-3.27, p < 0.001). Factors associated with better survival included the following: south-Asian ethnicity, RR = 0.6 (0.46-0.80, p < 0.001); renal transplantation, RR = 0.20 (95 CI 0.11-0.59, p < 0.0001) and glomerulonephritis as the primary renal disease, RR = 0.70 (0.50-0.97, p = 0.04). Factors associated with likelihood of transplantion were having a functioning fistulaperitoneal dialysis catheter at start of dialysis (RR 1.91, 95 CI 1.24-2.94, p = 0.003) and glomerulonephritis (RR 9.54, 95 CI 2.43-37.64, p = 0.001). Patients were less likely to receive if they were black (RR 0.10, 95 CI 0.02-0.34, p < 0.001), South Asian (RR 0.64, 95 CI 0.42-0.97, p = 0.037), diabetic (RR 0.06, 95 CI 0.01-0.23, p < 0.001) and had one or two comorbid conditions (RR 0.51, 95 CI 0.32-0.82, p = 0.06). Every decade increase in age was also associated with a lesser likelihood of transplantation (RR 0.55, 95 CI 0.49-0.61, p < 0.001).Discussion. Risk stratification at commencement of chronic dialysis may predict long-term survival in different patient groups. As expected ethnic minorities are less likely to receive a transplant and this should be addressed by the new waiting list prioritization. The better survival on dialysis in this population of patients with south-Asian ethnicity is unexplained and this requires further investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jain, P., Cockwell, P., Little, J., Ferring, M., Nicholas, J., Richards, N., … Smith, S. (2009). Survival and transplantation in end-stage renal disease: A prospective study of a multiethnic population. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 24(12), 3840–3846. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfp455

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free