Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis in an Equal-access Integrated Delivery System: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 7244 Patients With Bladder Cancer

10Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Disparities in bladder cancer survival by race/ethnicity and gender are likely related to differences in diagnosis. We assessed disparities in stage at diagnosis and potential contributing factors within a large, integrated delivery system. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 7244 patients with bladder cancer age ≥ 21 years diagnosed from January 2001 to June 2015 within Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Bivariate analyses compared stage at diagnosis – as well as comorbidities, health plan membership length, and health care utilization prior to diagnosis – by race/ethnicity, gender, and age. Multivariable generalized linear mixed models with urologist as a random effect were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) versus non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Results: In multivariable analyses, stage at diagnosis varied significantly by race/ethnicity (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Danforth, K. N., Luong, T. Q., Yi, D. K., Yamamoto, A., Kawatkar, A. A., Kim, P. H., … Williams, S. G. (2020). Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis in an Equal-access Integrated Delivery System: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 7244 Patients With Bladder Cancer. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, 18(2), e91–e102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2019.09.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free