Short-Term Outcome after Arthroscopic Bursectomy Debridement of Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendonopathy with and Without Subacromial Decompression: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

27Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose To conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial to assess whether arthroscopic bursectomy and debridement of the calcific deposit, with or without subacromial decompression, influences the functional outcome of patients with calcific tendonitis. Methods During a 4-year period, 80 patients were recruited who presented to the study center with refractory calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. Forty patients were randomized to have a subacromial decompression, and 40 were randomized not to have a subacromial decompression in combination with bursectomy and arthroscopic removal of the calcific deposit. All surgery was performed by one surgeon who was blinded to the functional assessment of the patients. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), and length of symptoms were recorded at the time of randomization. Patients were asked to complete a pain visual analog score (VAS), short form (SF-12), disability arm shoulder and hand (DASH), and Constant score (CS) preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Results There were 21 male and 59 female patients with a mean age of 49 (range, 32 to 75) years. The mean time of follow-up was 13 (range, 12 to 15) months. There were no significant differences in gender, age, BMI, length of symptoms, or preoperative outcome measures assessed between the groups. Overall, for both groups there was a significant improvement in the pain VAS (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clement, N. D., Watts, A. C., Phillips, C., & McBirnie, J. M. (2015). Short-Term Outcome after Arthroscopic Bursectomy Debridement of Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendonopathy with and Without Subacromial Decompression: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 31(9), 1680–1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.05.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free