Are i-STAT results adversely affected by an artificial blood substitute in vivo?

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether i-STAT measurements on blood treated with hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier-201 (HBOC-201) would provide laboratory test results comparable to those achieved with a known reliable piece of equipment (Radiometer) for swine blood treated with HBOC-201. HBOC-201 is an artificial blood substitute solution being considered for use by medics in the field for the treatment of combat casualties. The i-STAT is a portable compact piece of laboratory equipment used for rapid assessment of blood samples under field conditions, instead of larger, hospital-based, laboratory equipment. Blood from pigs was obtained before and after administration of HBOC-201. The blood was tested with the i-STAT and the Radiometer. No drastic inaccuracy in test results with the i-STAT can be predicted for battlefield casualty care with potential HBOC-201 use, because laboratory results with the i-STAT and Radiometer were comparable with respect to blood testing after the administration of HBOC-201.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Estrada, R. R. (2006). Are i-STAT results adversely affected by an artificial blood substitute in vivo? Military Medicine, 171(5), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.171.5.381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free