Comparison of divergence-free filters for cardiac 4D PC-MRI data

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

4D PC-MRI enables the measurement of time-resolved blood flow directions within a 3D volume. These data facilitate a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis. However, noise is introduced, e.g., due to inhomogeneous magnetic field gradients. Blood is commonly assumed as a non-Newtonian fluid, thus, incompressible, and divergence should be zero. Divergence-free filters enforce this model assumption and have been shown to improve data quality. In this paper, we compare binomial smoothing and three of these techniques: The finite difference method (FDM), divergence-free radial basis functions (DFRBF) and divergence-free wavelets (DFW). The results show that average and maximum velocities tend to decrease, while average line lengths tend to increase slightly. We recommend FDM or DFW divergence-free filtering as an optional pre-processing step in 4D PC-MRI processing pipelines, as they have feasible computation times of few seconds.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sereno, M. F., Köhler, B., & Preim, B. (2018). Comparison of divergence-free filters for cardiac 4D PC-MRI data. In Informatik aktuell (Vol. 0, pp. 139–144). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56537-7_44

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free