Effects of early standardized enteral nutrition on preventing acute muscle loss in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with mechanical ventilation

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the eff ects of early standardized enteral nutrition (EN) on the crosssectional area of erector spine muscle (ESMcsa), plasma growth diff erentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), and 28-day mortality of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). METHODS: A total of 97 AECOPD patients with invasive MV were screened in the ICUs of the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang. The conventional EN group (stage I) and early standardized EN group (stage II) included 46 and 51 patients, respectively. ESMcsa loss and GDF-15 levels on days 1 and 7 of ICU admission and 28-day survival rates were analyzed. RESULTS: On day 7, the ESMcsa of the early standardized EN group was significantly higher than that of the conventional EN group, while the plasma GDF-15 levels were significantly lower than those in the conventional EN group (ESMcsa: 28.426±6.130 cm2 vs. 25.205±6.127 cm2; GDF-15: 1661.608±558.820 pg/mL vs. 2541.000±634.845 pg/mL; all P<0.001]. The 28-day survival rates of the patients in the early standardized EN group and conventional EN group were 80.40% and 73.90%, respectively (P=0.406). CONCLUSION: ESMcsa loss in AECOPD patients with MV was correlated with GDF-15 levels, both of which indicated acute muscular atrophy and skeletal muscle dysfunction. Early standardized EN may prevent acute muscle loss and intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) in AECOPD patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Y., Xie, Y. P., Li, X. M., & Lu, T. (2023). Effects of early standardized enteral nutrition on preventing acute muscle loss in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with mechanical ventilation. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 14(3), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free