Conclusion: Human thinking is characterized by development since the establishment of societies, and is growing every day, and this requires work on the development of thinking skills necessary for individuals to be able to solve the problems of current and future, a socially acceptable manner. The century this may be a century of human intelligence, and excellence will be a community that works on the development of thinking of its members. We live in an age characterized by the wealth of scientific and modern technology, and this requires multiple methods of thinking to confront them and try to overcome them. Our vehicle for this is science, science and knowledge are power have become the new world. The building and personal growth of normal primary objectives of the educational process, and each individual's unique and distinctive character which is different from the other individuals. So the current is determined by the importance of research, known ways of thinking's favorite (Sternberg), the extension educators and its relationship to pattern their characters. Target current research to answer the following questions: 1- What ways of thinking favored by Educational counselors in light of the theory (Asternberg) to ways of thinking. 2- Is there a statistically significant correlation between ways of thinking in the light of the theory (Asternberg), Educational counselors in the pattern of their personality (extraversion - introversion), and (neuroticism - stability). To achieve the objectives of the research, the researcher tools are: a list of ways of thinking for (Sternberg) short list, a list (Eisenk) to personal style, and After finding the psychometrical properties for the criterion as, a sample (100) counselors has been tested chosen randomly out of the whole group of counselors (143) who work in secondary and intermediate schools in the General Directorate of Education in Kirkuk. After processing the data concisely using the (t-test, on sample and two samples, the person factor device ). The study comes up with the following conclusion: 1- The most favored ways of thinking among members of the sample are ways of thinking (hierarchical, liberal, estoppel, PLC). 2- there was no statistically significant relationships between overlapping ways of thinking according to the theory (Sternberg), and personal style according to the theory (Eisenk), for members of the research sample, except in the two methods are the only two methods (local and Royal). We conclude from this that there are relationships between the function's ways of thinking (Sternberg), and personal characteristics. In light of these results, the researcher recommends taking advantage of the tools in the development of outreach programs develop positive ways of thinking and patterns of personal individuals. As proposed, a similar study of the current study on teachers, teachers and school administrators.
CITATION STYLE
Putra, Y. S. (2016). ANALISIS INDEKS KEPUASAN MASYARAKAT (IKM) TERHADAP PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI PUSKESMAS TEGALREJO KOTA SALATIGA TAHUN 2012. Among Makarti, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.52353/ama.v5i2.130
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.