Human evaluation of three machine translation systems: From quality to attitudes by professional translators

5Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article aims to compare three machine translation systems with a focus on human evaluation. The systems under analysis are a domain-adapted statistical machine translation system, a domain-adapted neural machine translation system and a generic machine translation system. The comparison is carried out on translation from Spanish into German with industrial documentation of machine tool components and processes. The focus is on the human evaluation of the machine translation output, specifically on: fluency, adequacy and ranking at the segment level; fluency, adequacy, need for post-editing, ease of post-editing, and mental effort required in post-editing at the document level; productivity (post-editing speed and post-editing effort) and attitudes. Emphasis is placed on human factors in the evaluation process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández-Torné, A., & Matamala, A. (2021). Human evaluation of three machine translation systems: From quality to attitudes by professional translators. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (18), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.35869/VIAL.V0I18.3366

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free