Was the watchmaker blind? Or was she one-eyed?

41Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The question whether evolution is blind is usually presented as a choice between no goals at all (‘the blind watchmaker’) and long-term goals which would be external to the organism, for example in the form of special creation or intelligent design. The arguments either way do not address the question whether there are short-term goals within rather than external to organisms. Organisms and their interacting populations have evolved mechanisms by which they can harness blind stochasticity and so generate rapid functional responses to environmental challenges. They can achieve this by re-organising their genomes and/or their regulatory networks. Epigenetic as well as DNA changes are involved. Evolution may have no foresight, but it is at least partially directed by organisms themselves and by the populations of which they form part. Similar arguments support partial direction in the evolution of behavior.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noble, R., & Noble, D. (2017, December 20). Was the watchmaker blind? Or was she one-eyed? Biology. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology6040047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free