Single Word Insertions as Code-Switching or Established Borrowing?

  • Hadei M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study aims to show whether or not English single word insertions in Persian can be considered as code-switching or established borrowing. A mixed method design is chosen for the study. Data for the present study were collected from 12 Persian-English bilingual speakers in different tape-recorded spontaneous conversations. The findings of the study revealed that English single word insertions cannot be considered as established borrowing for several reasons:  a) They are not integrated phonologically into the Persian frame b) They behave similarly to phrasal insertions with different Persian markers c) They are not fixed in the mental lexicon of the bilingual Persian-English speakers and are used without any awareness and d) English verbs cannot integrate into the Persian frame- neither morphologically nor syntactically. Overall, the present study agrees with Myers-Scotton’s (2002) that borrowing arises originally as code-switching, and borrowed forms and code-switched forms tend to fall across a continuum.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hadei, M. (2016). Single Word Insertions as Code-Switching or Established Borrowing? International Journal of Linguistics, 8(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i1.8899

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free