Submarine groundwater discharge of nutrients and copper to an urban subestuary of Chesapeake Bay (Elizabeth River)

136Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigated the role submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) plays in the delivery of nutrients and copper to the Elizabeth River (Virginia) estuary, a major subestuary of lower Chesapeake Bay. Using an approach based on radium isotopes, we concluded that two distinct sources of groundwater were equally impacting the estuary: a surface (marsh) aquifer and deep aquifer source each with a unique 228Ra/226Ra activity ratio. Considering each of these sources, we calculated an SGD flux of 1 × 106 m3 d-1 (±10%), which represented ∼6% of the SGD flux for the entire Chesapeake Bay and ∼5% of the James River, a major source of freshwater to lower Chesapeake Bay. SGD-derived dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) fluxes averaged 4.5 (±4.6) and 0.16 (±0.17) mmol m-2 d-1, respectively, and compared well with area-normalized fluxes to Chesapeake Bay. In contrast, SGD-derived Cu input of 730 (±390) kg yr-1 was a relatively small source of Cu (∼3%) to the Elizabeth estuary given that surface water inputs, such as antifouling paints associated with naval operations, are a major component of the Cu budget for this system. These findings were in general agreement with prior studies of SGD for this region.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Charette, M. A., & Buesseler, K. O. (2004). Submarine groundwater discharge of nutrients and copper to an urban subestuary of Chesapeake Bay (Elizabeth River). Limnology and Oceanography, 49(2), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.2.0376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free