Inter-rater reliability of the 1992 international standards for neurological and functional classification of incomplete spinal cord injury

66Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To determine the inter-rater reliability in scoring sensory and motor function and in defining sensory and motor levels in incomplete spinal cord injury, using the revised 1992 International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISCSCI-92) and to determine the effect on raters agreement of one standardising assessment. Methods: Two physicians and two physiotherapists at the Spinal Cord Injury Unit, Karolinska Hospital, classified 23 patients according to the ISCSCI-92. Kappa values were calculated. Results: Kappa values varied from 0 to 0.83 (poor to very good) for the pin-prick scores, from 0 to 1 for the light touch scores and from 0 to 0.89 for motor function after the standardising assessment. Kappa values for sensory and motor levels were fair to poor after the standardising assessment. The results showed improvement in degree of agreement in 35/46 dermatomes for scoring pin-prick, in 15/42 for light touch, in 14/19 segments for motor function and for three out of four sensory and motor levels. Conclusion: This study indicates a weak inter-rater reliability for scoring incomplete SCI lesions using the ISCSCI-92.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jonsson, M., Tollbäck, A., Gonzales, H., & Borg, J. (2000). Inter-rater reliability of the 1992 international standards for neurological and functional classification of incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 38(11), 675–679. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free