Analysis of antioxidant activity and texture profile of tender-young and king coconut (Cocos nucifera) mesocarps under different treatments and the possibility to develop a food product

10Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Thepresent study is aimed at analyzing the antioxidant activity using the free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)method and the texture using the Brookfield texture analyzer for blanched-solar dried, blanched-cooledwith dehumidification, unblanchedsolar dried, and unblanched-cooled with dehumidificationmesocarps of two varieties of tender coconut, such as King coconut and Young coconut.Under the different treatments, there was a significant difference in the antioxidant activity and texture parameters such as "hardness" and "chewiness" at 5% level of significance. The highest (421.8 ± 12.33 mg/L) and the lowest (856.67±6.72 mg/L) antioxidant activities were recorded for blanched-solar dried mesocarp of King coconut and unblanched-cooled with dehumidification mesocarp of Young coconut, respectively.The texture analysis shows that there is a significant difference in the "hardness" and "chewiness" under different treatments at 5%level of significance.Among the treatedmesocarps highest "hardness" value (6619.7±147.1) and "chewiness" value (1079.3±54.90) were recorded for King coconut blanched-solar dried mesocarp and lowest "hardness" value (595.67±36.88) and "chewiness" value (12.634±0.836) were recorded for Young coconut blanched-cooled with dehumidification mesocarp. Since the blanched-solar dried mesocarp of King Coconut has highest antioxidant activity and lowest "chewiness", it is more suitable to develop a food product.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kalina, S., & Navaratne, S. B. (2019). Analysis of antioxidant activity and texture profile of tender-young and king coconut (Cocos nucifera) mesocarps under different treatments and the possibility to develop a food product. International Journal of Food Science, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7470696

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free