Oncologists' views on the importance of general practitioners for cancer patients: a qualitative interview study from Germany

6Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. Integrated cancer care requires cooperation between specialists and general practitioners (GPs). Mutual understanding of each other's tasks and responsibilities is essential if cooperation is to be successful. While GPs' opinions about oncologists have been addressed in previous studies, less is known about oncologists' views on the role of GPs' in cancer care, especially with regard to GPs' patient-centred, communication-based tasks. Objective. To assess oncologists' views on the importance of GPs for cancer patients. Methods. We conducted 15 qualitative guideline-based telephone interviews with oncologists using open-ended questions and analysed these interviews using thematic analysis. Results. Oncologists situated GPs as persons of trust for patients in a rather amicable sphere of caring in contrast to themselves who were situated in a rather biomedical sphere of evidencebased treatment decisions. Oncologists' appraisal of an overlapping of these spheres varied: While most stressed opportunities for patients (and themselves), others also mentioned risks. Conclusion. Our analysis found that oncologists clearly distinguish between their own sphere of evidence-based treatment decision-making and GPs' sphere of psychosocial caring. The question remains how these roles get interconnected in real life situations in order to meet patients' needs adequately. So far it seems that it is often the patient who is travelling between both spheres and needs to initiate interconnection to get comprehensive cancer care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Engler, J., Kone, I., Holmberg, C., Baumann, W., Siebenhofer, A., & Güthlin, C. (2017). Oncologists’ views on the importance of general practitioners for cancer patients: a qualitative interview study from Germany. Family Practice, 34(6), 730–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free