Children's misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers' views

69Citations
Citations of this article
276Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Young children hold naive theories about the world around them, but how do these mediate science learning in primary school? This paper considers the process of conceptual change and describes empirical studies into children's naive theories of physics concepts. The Representational Redescription model is invoked to explain how naive theories are a feature of conceptual change. Data are presented from a survey of 122 teachers of primary science in England. The teachers rated almost one-third of the topics sampled from the primary curriculum as being of above average difficulty for the children, particularly abstract concepts like electricity and forces. In addition, the teachers identified 130 misconceptions (such as 'Stones grow' or 'Taller people are older than shorter people') which children bring to the science class. These data provide a starting point for considering how children's naive theories may mediate their ability to learn and implications for science teaching are discussed. © 2001, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pine, K. J., Messer, D., & St. John, K. (2001). Children’s misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers’ views. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 19(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120046240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free