Transcutaneous CO2 Monitoring in Extremely Low Birth Weight Premature Infants

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) premature infants are particularly susceptible to hypocarbia and hypercarbia, which are associated with brain and lung morbidities. Transcutaneous CO2 (TcCO2) monitoring allows for continuous non-invasive CO2 monitoring during invasive and non-invasive ventilation and is becoming more popular in the NICU. We aimed to evaluate the correlation and agreement between CO2 levels measured by a TcCO2 monitor and blood gas CO2 (bgCO2) among ELBW infants. This was a prospective observational multicenter study. All infants < 1000 g admitted to the participating NICUs during the study period were monitored by a TcCO2 monitor, if available. For each bgCO2 measured, a simultaneous TcCO2 measurement was documented. In total, 1828 pairs of TcCO2–bgCO2 values of 94 infants were collected, with a median (IQR) gestational age of 26.4 (26.0, 28.3) weeks and birth weight of 800 (702, 900) g. A moderate correlation (Pearson: r = 0.64) and good agreement (bias (95% limits of agreement)):(2.9 [−11.8, 17.6] mmHg) were found between the TcCO2 and bgCO2 values in the 25–70 mmHg TcCO2 range. The correlation between the TcCO2 and bgCO2 trends was moderate. CO2 measurements by TcCO2 are in good agreement (bias < 5 mmHg) with bgCO2 among premature infants < 1000 g during the first week of life, regardless of day of life, ventilation mode (invasive/non-invasive), and sampling method (arterial/capillary/venous). However, wide limits of agreement and moderate correlation dictate the use of TcCO2 as a complementary tool to blood gas sampling, to assess CO2 levels and trends in individual patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borenstein-Levin, L., Avishay, N., Soffer, O., Arnon, S., Riskin, A., Dinur, G., … Hochwald, O. (2023). Transcutaneous CO2 Monitoring in Extremely Low Birth Weight Premature Infants. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175757

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free