A Fair Comparison without Translationese: English vs. Target-language Instructions for Multilingual LLMs

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Most large language models are multilingual instruction executors. Prior studies suggested that English instructions are more effective than target-language instructions even for non-English tasks; however, these studies often use datasets and instructions translated from English, which introduce biases known as translationese, hindering an unbiased comparison. To address this issue, we conduct a fair comparison between English and target-language instructions by eliminating translationese effects. Contrary to previous studies, our experiments across several tasks reveal that the advantage of adopting English instructions is not overwhelming. Additionally, we report on the features of generated texts and the instruction-following abilities when using respective instructions. Our source code is publicly available at the following URL1

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Enomoto, T., Kim, H., Chen, Z., & Komachi, M. (2025). A Fair Comparison without Translationese: English vs. Target-language Instructions for Multilingual LLMs. In Proceedings of the 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Long Papers, NAACL-HLT 2025 (Vol. 2, pp. 649–670). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-short.55

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free