Moving Beyond “Facts Are Facts”: Managing Emotions and Legitimacy After a Fake News Attack

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Drawing upon case study research investigating the Irish Health Service Executive’s (HSE) response to a fake news attack on their human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign, we argue that responses to fake news should be analyzed from a legitimacy perspective. A model for emotional legitimacy management is proposed in which the HSE and a third-party collaborate to (a) connect with the emotional aspects of the issue; (b) leverage emotions to build vicarious legitimacy; (c) transfer the third-party’s legitimacy to the HSE; and (d) emotionally activate the public. This study contributes to fake news and legitimacy management by moving beyond fact-checking and debunking strategies. We suggest a framework centered on legitimacy in which emotions are used to counteract fake news. Finally, we emphasize the importance of third-party vicarious legitimacy building and the transfer of this legitimacy to the organization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joachim, M., Castelló, I., & Parry, G. (2026). Moving Beyond “Facts Are Facts”: Managing Emotions and Legitimacy After a Fake News Attack. Business and Society, 65(2 Special Issue: Unbelievable! How fake news affects the relationship between Business and Society), 389–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503241281632

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free