Abstract
This article seeks to explain the battering sustained by the United States' National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) during the ongoing culture wars over federal subsidies, by situating the NEA in the conjoined histories of both U.S. cultural policy and contemporary debates about citizenship. On the basis of this analysis, it is suggested that the policy options of leaving culture to the market, base, or existing systems of support all lack a base in democratic politics. © 2000 Sage Publications, Inc.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Miller, T. (2000). The national endowment for the arts in the 1990s: A black eye on the arts? American Behavioral Scientist, 43(9), 1429–1445. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640021955973
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.